Web 2.0 Thinking Game
The most telling detail in The Economist’s coverage of Google and YouTube was the subhead: “Google’s acquisition of YouTube shows that ‘Web 2.0′ has come of age.” A few weeks back, The Economist was calling “Web 2.0″ a trend. Their phrase was, “hot Web 2.0 trend.” The magazine now intends “Web 2.0″ to be understood as a sort of second edition:
This week’s pairing of Google and YouTube may come to be remembered as the moment “Web 2.0″—ie, the web, version two—came of age.
Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying:
Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.
Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube.
Put another way:
Web 1.0: New media company buys old media company.
Web 2.0: New media company buys new media company.
If we’re stuck with this meaningless Web 2.0 label, let’s at least have some fun with it. Here’s my new game. I’ll start, you finish:
Web 1.0: Joshua Davis on the cover of Art News.
Web 2.0: 37signals on the cover of Forbes.
Web 1.0: Users create the content (Slashdot).
Web 2.0: Users create the content (Flickr).
Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities.
Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace.
Web 1.0: Writing.
Web 2.0: Rating.
Web 1.0: Karma Points.
Web 2.0: Diggs.
Web 1.0: Cool Site of the Day.
Web 2.0: Technorati.com.
Web 1.0: Tags.
Web 2.0: “Tags.”
Web 1.0: Bookmarking.
Web 2.0: Bookmark sharing.
Web 1.0: Pointless Flash widgets.
Web 2.0: Pointless “Ajax” widgets.
Now you try it!
Web 1.0: Zeldman.com without comments
Web 2.0: Zeldman.com with comments
;-)
Web 1.0: 12px h2
Web 2.0: 51px h2
Web 1.0: Animated gif
Web 2.0: Badges
Web 1.0: Arial
Web 2.0: Arial Rounded/Georgia
Web 1.0: Bloated Table Code
Web 2.0: Divitis
Web 1.0: Social drinking
Web 2.0: Social bookmarking
Web 1.0: Webmail 2mb storage
Web 2.0: Webmail 2gb storage
Web 1.0: Developers whinging about Netscape users who won’t upgrade to Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Developers whinging about Internet Explorer users who won’t upgrade to Firefox
Web 1.0 : Deserted blogs on Blogger
Web 2.0 : Deserted blogs on Wordpress
Web 1.0 : The past
Web 2.0 : The present
Web 3.0 : The future
Web 1.0: Large expanses of default-white dotted with unformatted text
Web 2.0: Large expanses of white with a gradient at the top dotted with meticulously formatted and precisely positioned text
Web 1.0: Comic Sans in font tags to give your site that “friendly edge”
Web 2.0: Comic Sans in style sheets with no capitalisation of words to give your site that “friendly edge”
Web 1.0: Working at the web agency
Web 2.0: Working at your own start-up
Web 3.0: Working on a tropical island
Web 1.0: “Under Construction”
Web 2.0: “Beta”
Web 1.0: Bank loan
Web 2.0: Venture Capital
Web 1.0: Meaningful domain names
Web 2.0: Unpronouncable domain names
Web 1:0: objects
Web 2.0: theory objects
Web 1.0: Site under construction
Web 2.0: Beta
Web 1.0: Flashy banners
Web 2.0: Banner flashes
Web 1.0: Communication
Web 2.0: Conversation
Web 1.0: Times New Roman
Web 2.0: Arial, Helvetica, Verdana (and a bit of Georgia, too)
Web 1.0: Geocities
Web 2.0: Google Pages
Web 1.0: Ajax = Football team in Netherlands
Web 2.0: AJAX = well…
On a more serious note:
Web 1.0: You and I
Web 2.0: Us
Regards,
Shri.
Web 1.0: CEOs
Web 2.0: “Thought leaders.”
Web 1.0 - Dot com bubble
Web 2.0 - Dot com hubble bubble toil and trouble (it runs on witchcraft and other things most folk will never quite understand)
Web 1.0 - text and image
Web 2.0 - image and animation
Web 3.0 - animation and time/space virtual continuum
Web 1.0: <p><font …>
Web 2.0: <div><div><div><div><span><h3>
(I’m having a drink if this doesn’t display right.)
Web 1.0: conferences
Web 2.0: conferences
Web 1.0: venture capital
Web 2.0: venture capital
;-)
[...] Ultra cool the word/thinking game on Jeffrey Zeldman’s blog on the differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. I liked the comments on it, especially: [...]
Web 1.0: Yahoo! launches
Web 2.0: Yahoo! gets acquired…
Web 1.0: IE 5.0
Web 2.0: IE 7.0
Web 1.0: Visting Blogs
Web 2.0: Unbolding RSS Feeds
Web 1.0: Green
Web 2.0: #CCDDAA
Web 1.0: Links
Web 2.0: Relationships
Web 1.0 The bigger the bevel the more important the button
Web 2.0 The shinier the plastic the more important the button
web 1.0: Inaccessible DHTML
web 2.0: Inaccessible AJAX
Web 1.0: pop-ups
Web 2.0: flash pop-overs
“Web 2.0″ makes my ubiquitous stomach churn.
Web 1.0: Spam emails
Web 2.0: Spam emails and spam comments
Web 1.0: Post copyrighted content
Web 2.0: Download and redistribute copyrighted content
Web 1.0: Rounded corners are new and kinda cool
Web 2.0: Rounded corners are confused with Web 2.0
Web 1.0: Text that wraps to your browser window
Web 2.0: Text that makes you widen your browser window if you want to read it all without horizontal scrolling
Web 1.0 - Bookmark this site!
Web 2.0 - Digg this post!
web 1.0: bloated, useless DHTML
web 2.0: bloated, uesless Javascript Libraries
web 1.0: animated gifs
web 2.0: scriptaculous
web 1.0: all talk, no action by the W3C
web 2.0: all talk, no action by the W3C
web 1.0: blue background colour
web 2.0: green background colour
Web 1.0 Annoying and useless Javascript
Web 2.0 Annoying and useless Javascript that means your app doesn’t work cross anything
Web 1.0 “Bullshit eBusiness Seminars”
Web 2.0 “Blogger conferences, and BlogHer Conferences.”
Web 1.0 - Meta Tags
Web 2.0 - SEO
Web 1.0 - Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.
Web 2.0 - Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS.
Web 1.0 - Google Ninja
Web 2.0 - AJAX/Web Ninja*
Web 1.0 - Actually design websites
Web 2.0 - Attend and host hundreds of conferences
*I never got the whole freaking ninja thing? There are too many geeks on the web.
Web 1.0:
<code><P><FONT COLOR=green SIZE=4>Header</P></FONT></code>
Web 2.0:
<code><h2 class=”sIFR-replaced”><embed style=”width:200px; height:40px;” class=”sIFR-flash” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” sifr=”true” bgcolor=”#FFFFFF” wmode=”" flashvars=”txt=Header&textcolor=#080&w=200&h=40″ quality=”best” src=”/swf/cool-font.swf” height=”40″ width=”200″><span class=”sIFR-alternate”>Header</span></h2></code>
Web 1.0: Old folks have no clue.
Web 2.0: My parents just left a comment on my blog.
Web 1.0: MAC and PC Ads by APPLE
Web 2.0: MAC and PC Ads by TrueNuff TV!
web 1.0: Published standards and browsers that don’t support them
web 2.0: “De-facto” standards by browsers that don’t support 10-year old standards.
Web 1.x: 3 months = 1 Web year
Web 2.x: 3 years = The last time my personal site was updated
Web 1.0 : DynAPI
Web 2.0 : jquery
Web 1.0: Having to turn off Java applets so you can actually read someone’s webpage.
Web 2.0: Having to turn off Flash plugin so you can actually read someone’s page.
Web 1.0 - I want round corners, nested TABLEs.
Web 2.0 - I want round corners, nested DIVs, Ps, SPANs, DOM manipulations.
Web 1.0 - You own a webdesign company because you started creating table based websites ten years ago. However, six years ago you understood the purpose of the web standards and website accessibility.
Web 2.0 - You own a webdesign company because you “designed” your first Wordpress blog a year ago and now you think that it is THE tool - valid markup, accessibility and RSS (yeah!) - all included
Fun!
web 1.0: rounded corners on table driven layouts
web 2.0: squared table-less CSS layouts
Very impresive write up!
Web 1.0: Poor standard support for Browsers
Web 2.0: Poor standard support for Browsers
Web 1.0 - We were not used to laugh about what we were doing
Web 2.0 - We currently laugh about this all stuff
Web 3.0 - Whatever it is… Just start laughing now!
Web 1.0: Keep code light!
Web 2.0: Keep design lighter!
Web 1.0: Links
Web 2.0: Blogroll
Web 1.0: 20,000 Hits on my webpage!
Web 2.0: Ive been dugg 1000 times on Digg!
Web 1.0: Javascript Image Rollovers
Web 2.0: CSS+AJAX Menus
Web 1.0: “The Edge”
Web 2.0: “Cool and Smooth”
Web 1.0: Clients who don’t get it
Web 2.0: Clients who don’t get it
Web 1.0: a,e,i,o,u
Web 2.0:
Web 1.0: Making web pages in a word processor.
Web 2.0: Preparing documents in a web browser.
Web 1.0: IE 3 running quickly with 3 or 4 windows open on a 200 Mhz PII with 128 MB RAM.
Web 2.0: Firefox 2.0rc2 running slowly with 10-20 tabs open on a 2.4 Ghz P4 with 512 MB RAM.
Web 1.0: Rational Unified Process implementing J2EE
Web 2.0: “Getting Real” using RoR
Web 1.0: Content is everything
Web 2.0: Someone else’s content is everything
web 1.0:
<a onclick="foo();">web 2.0:
var addListener = function(el, type, fn, o, b) { };Sorry I couldn’t help myself. I just wasn’t seeing any nerdy js entries in here.
Web1.0: print budget
Web2.0: print budget
Web1.0: journalist budget
Web2.0: journalist budget
Web1.0: TV production budget
Web2.0: TV production budget
Web1.0: No budget to strong budget
Web2.0: No budget to strong budget
Web1.0: We are the best. Dot.
Web2.0: We are the best. You know, with RSS, Semantic CSS, Social bookmarks, Ajax, …
Web1.0: Experience this effect
web2.0: Experience this content
Web1.0: Zeldman
Web2.0: Zeldman
Web 1.0: Programming languages for real men.
Web 2.0: Ruby on Rails.
Web 1.0: Perl or PHP
Web 2.0: Django or Ruby on Rails
Web 1.0: Overly large DHTML libraries.
Web 2.0: Overly large AJAX libraries (with DHTML).
web 1.0: Ah, those were the days
web 2.0: Ah, those were the days
web 3.0: Enough reminiscing, back to work…
Web 1.0: Couldn’t wait to get involved.
Web 2.0: Can’t wait for 2.0 to pass.
Web 1.0: Textism.com
Web 2.0: Whatever
Web 1.0: HTML markup.
Web 2.0: HTML with CSS, meaning it has half the bloatedness.
Web 1.0: NASDAQ.
Web 2.0: NASDAQ after the bubble burst, meaning it has half the value.
Web 1.0: Silicon Valley 1999… out of touch with the real world.
Web 2.0: Silicon Valley 2006… out of touch with the real world.
Oh, wait a second!
web 1.0: Completely Flash sites suck.
web 2.0: Completely Flash sites still suck.
Web 1.0: Napster to download Music and Video
Web 2.0: Pure Volume and MySpace for music, YouTube for everything
web 1.0: sorry we’re still testing
web 2.0: yay! we’re beta!
Web 1.0: target=”_blank”
Web 2.0: onclick=”window.open(this.href); return false;”
Just a few days ago you were pondering your lack of interest ….. now this. Methinks the a-listers are over it.
Web 1.0: the web is for geeks
Web 2.0: gimme some of that web action
Web 1.0: Clutter
Web 2.0: Prettier, more accessible clutter
Thank you, Web 2.0, you are the the Container Store for all our crap.
Web 1.0: Simple design with vapid content.
Web 2.0: Slick design with vapid content.
Web 1.0: Zeldman’s “Steal My Icons” on every site*
Web 2.0: Orange RSS Feed icons on every site
*Yes, including mine.
Web 1.0: Boring, abandoned homepages.
Web 2.0: Boring, abandoned blogs.
Web 1.0: Solaris.
Web 2.0: Linux.
Web 1.0: Webmonkey/Dr. Web
Web 2.0: A List Apart/Sitepoint
Web 1.0: Netscape
Web 2.0: Mozilla
Web 1.0: “Sign my guestbook!”
Web 2.0: “Submit Comment”
Web 1.0: Flicker
Web 2.0: Flickr
Web 1.0: Look what I did in FrontPage
Web 2.0: Look what I did in DreamWeaver
Web 1.0: “Don’t use CSS”
Web 2.0: “Don’t use IE”
Web 1.0: Jolt Cola
Web 2.0: Double caffeinated mocha late slim
Web 1.0: Spell check through Word
Web 2.0: Spell check through Google
Web 1.0: Rubberband
Web 2.0: Broadband
Web1.0: Making half-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users
Web2.0: Making three-quarter-assed effort to design for blind and handicapped users
Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us
Web 2.0: Web 2.0 Thinking Game
Web 1.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 2.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 3.0: Make Money Make Money Make Money
Web 1.0: Microsoft Don’t Listen
Web 2.0: Microsoft try to Listen
Web 3.0: Microsoft Actually Listen - but its too late for them
Web 1.0: Web Developers risk all to Create an Experience
Web 2.0: Web Developers Anally follow code guidelines and the experience becomes drained of life, spontaneous ideas are replaced with the html equivalent of keeping up with the Jones’s
Web 1.0: Get a Mac already! Geez your doing that the hard way.
Web 2.0: Get Firefox Already! Geez your doing that the hard way.
Web 1.0 I just hooked up my friend’s band site for $300! let’s go see a movie.
Web 2.0 Band borrows computer to check myspace ?
Web 1.0 What’s the easiest way to build a site for cheap?
Web 2.0 How can I build an internet for free?
web 1.0: “convergence” and “synergy”
web 2.0: “community”
Web 1.0: All Your Base Are Belong To Us!
Web 2.0: What ever’s hot on YouTube.
Web 1.0: Hotmail
Web 2.0: Gmail
Web 1.0: excitement for “web 2.0″
Web 2.0: wish i never heard of “web 2.0″
web 1.0: animated gifs
web 2.0: animated javascript
Web 1.0: Content is king!
Web 2.0: Contributed content is king! (ie the comments are more informative than the original post)
Web 1.0: Underconstruction
Web 2.0 Beta
Paul, this happen everywhere:
Web 1.0 - Looking for an experienced designer. Must be able to design and implement websites using HTML, CSS. Knowledge of Javascript a bonus.
Web 2.0 - Looking for an experienced designer. The candidate must be affluent in XHTML, CSS, Javascript, DHTML, AJAXY GOODNESS, Ruby on Rails, PHP, JSP, SQL, MySql, ASP.net, XML, Actionscript (2.0 and 3.0), Adobe CS2 products, Dreamweaver, Coldfusion, Quark, eCommerce, SEO, linux, unix, IIS, bla.. bla..
“they” need God these days just to make their brochure(whatever) online.
web 1.0: The X-Files
web 2.0: Lost
web 1.0: suck.com
web 2.0: Fortean Times
web 1.0: stuffit
web 2.0: zip
Web 1.0: MS Word
Web 2.0: Writely
Web 1.0: drop shadows
Web 2.0: reflections
Web 1.0: Whining in table-based messageboards
Web 2.0: Whining with style in shiny ajax messageboards
Web 1.0: Spiky polygons, moody colors, tiny annoying fonts
Web2.0: Trendy badges, pastel colors, ginormous annoying fonts
Web1.0: Joshua Davis
Web2.0: Thomas Fuchs
Web1.0: Partisan blowhard editorialists with a column in the online WSJ
Web2.0: Partisan blowhard users with a column on Newsvine
Web1.0: Brief, functional footers
Web2.0: Tall, verbose “footers” larger than the actual content region
Web 1.0: Jerry Yang and David Filo build a list of the coolest websites, and later realise there might be a business model
Web 2.0: Nobody’s got a business model, but everybody’s got a list of the coolest websites
Web1.0: Web rings
Web2.0: Social bookmarking
Web 1.0: Initial Public Offering
Web 2.0: Venture Capital
Web 1.0 Business Plan: Sell for less than we bought it for.
Web 2.0 Business Plan: Sell ads on stuff we didn’t actually pay for.
Web 1.0: SQL/Javascript Injection
Web 2.0: Cross-Site Scripting
Web 1.0: Move to Unix-like never-crashing ultra-secure Linux.
Web 2.0: Move to Mac.
Web 1.0 - online diary
Web 2.0 - blog
Web 1.0 - email
Web 2.0 - Gmail
Web 1.0 - awful background music
Web 2.0 - awful background gradients
Web 1.0 - slashdot
Web 2.0 - Digg
Web 1.0: “I go get”
Web 2.0: “Come to me”
http://www.webdirections.org/come-to-me-web/
Web 1.0: Dial-up
Web 2.0: Dump Trucks
Web 1.0: Spinny logos
Web 2.0: Reflecty logos
web 1.0 - wanking to pictures of Jenna Jameson
web 2.0 - wanking to videos of jenna jameson
Web 1.0: Dancing Hampsters
Web 2.0: Dancing on Treadmills
Web 1.0: Windows
Web 2.0: Linux
Web 1.0: Close Source
Web 2.0: Open Source
Web 1.0: Viruses downloading and slowing down computer.
Web 2.0: Automatic Updates downloading and slowing down computer.
Web 1.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous shipping prices
Web 2.0: Online canned goods stores with outrageous amounts of google adsense banners to offset outrageous shipping charges.
Web 1.0: Cleaning your wheel mouse
Web 2.0: Forgetting that your mouse has a wheel and going blind from the laser
Web 1.0: Internet Explorer
Web 2.0: Firefox
Web 1.0: Yahoo!
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1.0: experiment, take risks, spinoff.
Web 2.0: see something popular and acquire.
Web 1.0: RealPlayer is abit of a hog, but not too annoying
Web 2.0: RealPlayer is downright Malware.
Web 1.0: Chat rooms
Web 2.0: MMORPGs
Web 1.0: Collections of Matching background and button sets
Web 2.0: Collections of Skins
Web 1.0: Boxes with border=”0″
Web 2.0: Boxes with style=”border: 1px dotted #CCC;”
:)
Web 1.0: Text based turn game (Empyrez.com)
Web 2.0: Full blown 3d
Web 1.0: 640×480 Porn
Web 2.0: 1024×768 Porn
Web 1.0: “Site best viewed with Internet Explorer”
Web 2.0: “Site best viewed with anything but Internet Explorer”
Web 1.0: JavaScript Alerts
Web 2.0: Light YellowDiv’s with Grey Borders
Web 1.0: DrudgeReport.com
Web 2.0: SundayReader.com
Web 1.0: disable ActiveX for security reason
Web 2.0: disable ActiveX, java, Javascript, Flash to get the content
Web 1.0: Site goes down when hosting company upgrades to a better server
Web 2.0: Site goes down with a reader serves you up to an upgrade on Digg
Web 1.0: Websites proudly display buttons proclaiming “_______’s Top Site of the Day” or “______’s Coolest on the Web”, where there are hundreds of ranking authorities.
Web 2.0: Millions of surfers use tags and social bookmarks to place the same sites simultaneously on Digg, Del.icio.us, and Reddit.
Web 1.0: , and
Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs
Web 1.0: <blink>, <font> and <frameset>
Web 2.0: scriptaculous, CSS and DIVs
Web 1.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy ActiveX controls.
Web 2.0: Web sites that don’t work on Linux because they use crappy Flash 8 controls.
Web 1.0: <html> </html>
Web 2.0: #css ;
Web 1.0: Create Content
Web 2.0: Link to created content
Web 1.0: Audience
Web 2.0: Communities
Web 1.0: Dial up
Web 2.0: Broadband
Web 1.0: Page views and Hits
Web 2.0: Still searching for the measurement metric
Web 1.0: Blink tags
Web 2.0: Blinking websites
Web 1.0: Yahoo buys everything
Web 2.0: Google buys everything
Web 1.0: Internet
Web 2.0: Web 2.0
Web 1.0: Perl
Web 2.0: Ruby
Web 3.0: Brainfuck
web 1.0: newsletter
web 2.0: syndicate rss/rdf
Web 1.0: Bookmarks
Web 2.0: Del.icio.us (God bless it)
Web 1.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows XP
Web 2.0: Blue Screens of Death on Windows Vista, followed by a quick reboot, followed by another BSOD, followed by a quick reboot…
Web 1.0: Bring the web into our lives
Web 2.0: Bring our lives into the web
Web 1.0 Pamela Anderson
Web 2.0 Paris Hilton
Web 1.0: < HTML > Hello World < /HTML >
Web 2.0: xhtml, css, php, xml, aspx, cms, templates, streaming, …
Online gaming Web 1.0:
You are in a room. There is a door to the north.
“Open door”
I don’t understand.
“Unlock door”
I don’t understand.
“Leave room”
I don’t understand.
“**** off!!
>
Online gaming Web 2.0:
Full Prince of Persia online Flash version! oooh, shiny.
Web 1.0 : we didnt’ know that .com bubble will collapse
Web 2.0 : we didn’t want to know that .com bubble would collapse
Web 1.0: Yahoomail
Web 2.0: Gmail
Web 3.0: God Knows what mail!
Web 1.0 IE
Web 2.0 FireFox
Web 3.0 MobilePhone brower
web 1.0: dirty.ru
web 2.0: leprosorium.dirty.ru
[...] отсюда: [...]
Web 1.0: Computer screens to display content
Web 2.0: Mobile digital devices for display and production of content
Web 1.0: Keeping the user on your site
Web 2.0: Branding your content on any site, device or publication
web 1.0: worked auto-magically (as far a client is concerned)
web 2.0: works web 2.0-ly (as far as a client is concerned)
Web 1.0: “Sponsored By … ” on web sites.
Web 2.0: “Sponsored By … ” on RSS feeds.
Web 1.0: Opinions
Web 2.0: Rants
Web 1.0 : Microsoft
Web 2.0 : Google
Web 1.0 : Slashdot effect
Web 2.0 : Digg effect
Web 1.0 : Boards
Web 2.0 : Blogs
Web 1.0 : Version numbers
Web 2.0 : Greek Letters (I mean common, a website “making it to gamma” ?)
Web 1.0 : “Mail this article to a friend” button
Web 2.0 : “Digg / Furl / Del.icio.us / Reddit / NewsWine / etc this” buttons
Web 1.0 : Worrying about privacy
Web 2.0 : Willing to tell more
Web 1.0: many window
Web 2.0: one window
Web 1.0: Grammar.com and.com Spelling.com
Web 2.0: Grmmr nd Spll.ng
Web 1.0: Intelligent Collectives
Web 2.0: Collective Intelligence
Web 1.0: Dictionary.com
Web 2.0: Dictionary.com
Web 1.0: Web Sites
Web 2.0: Web Services
Web 1.0: 404 Not Found
Web 2.0: 503 Resource unavailable
Web 1.0: Square corners
Web 2.0: Round corners
Web 1.0: …a list??
Web 2.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a menu if not a list of links?
Web 3.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a block of text if not a list of paragraphs?
Web 4.0: Of course you want a list, what’s a paragraph if not a list of words?
Web 1.0 :: Hubs, switches, routers, servers…
Web 2.0 :: “a series of Tubes”
Web 1.0: All kinds of mistakes were made
Web 2.0: Those same mistakes were repeated
Web 1.0 : <noscript>
Web2.0: <script>
Web 1.0: Bad HTML code
Web 2.0: Bad PHP code
Web 1.0: Geeks do it.
Web 2.0: Everybody does it.
Web 1.0 : http://www.hamsterdance.com/classorig.html
Web 2.0 : http://new.nabaztag.com/en/index.html
Web 1.0: Phrase lacking meaning that no-one ever used
Web 2.0: Phrase lacking meaning that everyone’s using
Web 1.0: tim berners lee gives us the web (for free!)
Web 2.0: tim o’reilly copyrights the term ‘web 2.0′
Web 1.0: emperor’s new clothes
Web 2.0: emperor’s new clothes part 2
Web 1.0: Spam
Web 2.0: Blatant identity theft
Web 1.0: Windows
Web 2.0: OSX
Web 1.0: dot com
Web 2.0: dot just-about-everything
Web 1.0: Yahoo!
Web 2.0: Boohoo for Yahoo! (Google)
Web 1.0: Cool!
Web 2.0: Cooler!
Web 1.0: 10 millions $
Web 2.0: 1 billion $
Web 1.0: Geeks with nothing better to do but think up new acronyms
Web 2.0: GWNBTD
Web1.0 :
Web 2.0:
ul {
float:left;
}
li {
list-style-type: none;
}
Web 1.0: chmod 755 web
Web 2.0: chmod 777 web
Web 1.0 : Napster copyrights problems
Web 2.0 : YouTube copyrights problems
web 1.0 - i hate the web
web 2.0 - i still hate the web
Web 1.0: Drop shadows
Web 2.0: Reflections
Web 1.0: Tiled background images
Web 2.0: Freakishly huge background images
Web 1.0: standard-web-palet-colored content (just text)
Web 2.0: true-color shiny-glossy-3D-beta-badged obtrusive animated links to content (video)
Web 1.0: buzzwords
Web 2.0: buzzwords
Web 1.0: Tons of useless static pages
Web 2.0: Tons of useless dynamic pages
Web 1.0: Sketchy CSS 1 support
Web 2.0: Sketchy CSS 2 support
Web 3.0: Sketchy CSS 3 support
Web 1.0 Some Paysites
Web 2.0 Lot Of Paysites
Web 1.0 Was very exiting
Web 2.0 Is very boring
Web 1.0 Napster (MP3)
Web 2.0 All kind of P2P (MP3, Videos and Worms)
Web 1.0 Explorer beats Netscape
Web 2.0 Firefox beats Explorer
Web 1.0 Only some cmmercials
Web 2.0 Too much commercials
Web 1.0 Java pop up commercials that sucks
Web 2.0 Flash pop up commercials wich sucks much more
An so on…
Web 1.0: Broken accessibility through table abuse
Web 2.0: Broken accessibility through JavaScript abuse
Web 1.0: Two spaces between sentences.
Web 2.0: No punctuation.
Web 1.0: Misspellings because of new “computer thing.”
Web 2.0: Misspellings because it’s cool and the .com you wanted is taken.
[...] Prenez quelques minutes pour lire cet article rafraichissant ! [...]
Web 1.0: Don’t talk to strangers.
Web 2.0: “I’m meeting gogoXguy24 tonight.”
Web 1.0: »Sign up to get a FREE e-mail newsletter!«
Web 2.0: »Enter your PIN here to confirm bank details«
E-mail 1.0 subject: MAKE MONEY FAST $$$
E-mail 2.0 subject: Re: Th1s watchh is amazingg
Web 1.0: Dialer
Web 2.0: Phishing
Web 1.0: yeah - online!!!
Web 2.0: Can’t go offline :-(
Web 1.0: fonts too small to read
Web 2.0: fonts too big to read
—-
Web 1.0: sitemaps
Web 2.0: huge footers
web 1.0: content to create you own 15 minutes of fame
web 2.0: endless rehash of of another’s minutes of fame
web 1.0: search based on algorithms
web 2.0: search based on ratings (contextual)
web 1.0: SPAM
web 2.0: SPLOGS
web 1.0: branding and corporate sites
web 2.0 lifestyle sites
web 1.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users
web 2.0: web agencies that don’t understand web users
web 1.0: crackdown on Napster
web 2.0: embracing torrent technology
web 1.0: hassled by spam
web 2.0: hassled by allowing senders in email clients
web 1.0: bands fear music distribution
web 2.0: bands distribute music through youtube
Web 1.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over a 28.8Kbps connection, and then crashes your browser.
Web 2.0: Page takes 5 minutes to download over an 8Mbps connection, and then crashes your browser.
web1.0: Doing Java - Haven’t tryed jBuilder but wiling to do so soon.
web2.0: doing php - Haven’t tryed joomla but wiling to do so soon.
web1.0: porn
web2.0: alt-porn
At least one thing will never change: Opera users griping at IE and Netscape(based) users to get with their standards (^_-)V
[...] This time, however, I think he got it right with the Web 2.0 Thinking Game post, and its comments. A good read in the afternoon, when you really just want it to be dinner time already. [...]
web1.0: wat the @*&$^#&#
web2.0: wat the *$#*(#*&$(*#@&#$($(*#&$
Web 1.0: Macromedia
Web 2.0: Adobe
Web 1.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and text versions
Web 2.0: Annoying welcome pages asking you to choose between HTML and Flash versions
Web 1.0: bubble #1
Web 2.0: bubble #2
Web 1.0: WebTV
Web 2.0: Wii
Web 1.0: Porn
Web 2.0: Better Porn
Web 1.0: Web 2.0
Web 2.0: Web 1.0
Web 1.0: Searching for ads with good pricing over Internet between a lot of useless text informations
Web 2.0: Searching for good text informations over Internet surrounded by ads
Web 1.0: windows
Web 2.0: tabs
Web 1.0: click and wait
Web 2.0: no waiting
Web 1.0: dot-com bubble!!!
Web 2.0: dot-com bubble???
Web1.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make contend that everyone needs, and you get rich
Web 2.0 : Marketing Manager say : Make Websites where everyone makes contend, and you get rich
Web 3.0 : Marketing Manager say : Fuck, Im so rich ..
Web 1.0: Reading forum entries, posting a reply
Web 2.0: Reading blog entries, trying to reply but getting caught in ads, trackbacks, pings, cross-posts, digg-links and captchas, before finally giving up in disgust
Web 1.0: Palm Pilot
Web 2.0: Moleskine, PocketMod
Web 1.0 - IE, Firefox on PC’s and Mac
Web 2.0 - Opera on Nintendo DS
Web 1.0: Emoticons
Web 2.0: Dancing smileys all over the place
Web 1.0: Unsupported software.
Web 2.0: Perpetual beta.
Web 1.0: Buck’s.
Web 2.0: Stack’s.
Web 1.0: Searching for content
Web 2.0: Searching for people who want to read the content
Web 1.0: Blocky reflections
Web 2.0: Glassy reflections
Web 1.0: Too much to learn, not enough time
Web 2.0: Too much to learn, not enough time
Web 1.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner
Web 2.0: Promise of a usable web standard around the corner
Web 1.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from spending time deleting spam
Web 2.0: Internet makes claims it will make your life better, then fails to make any real difference apart from becoming addicted to blogging, RSS, Social networking,
Web 1.0: No gym for home
Web 2.0: Web 1.0: No gym for home
Web 1.0: Al Gore
Web 2.0: What? No crazy dems want to claim it this year?
Web 1.0: Damn! Missed it…
Web 2.0: Damn! Missed it…
Web 3.0: This time…
Web 1.0: Read and Read
Web 2.0: Read and Write
Web 1.0: Does not exist.
Web 2.0: What’s that?
Web 1.0: AOL Chat rooms
Web 2.0: offtopic.com
Web 1.0: RSS/Atom feeds
Web 2.0: “Live” Bookmarks
Web 1.0: Directories
Web 2.0: CMS
Web 1.0: WAP
Web 2.0: Downloadable Ringtones
Web 1.0: FAQs
Web 2.0: Wikis
Web 1.0: Crashing browsers
Web 2.0: Self-closing browsers
Web 1.0: .wav/MP3/OGG-based journals
Web 2.0: Podcasting
Web 1.0: “Punch the Monkey” banner ads
Web 2.0: Pay-per-click ad revenue
Web 1.0: Homepages/mission statements with Flash intros
Web 2.0: Homepages/mission statements with Enhanced Flash intos
Web 1.0: Scroll text and flashing backgrounds
Web 2.0: Removal of the letter e from -er suffixes
Web 1.0: Aeron Chairs, Foozeball tables
Web 2.0: Gmail/Orkut/MySpace invites
Web 1.0: Hotmail & Yahoo
Web 2.0: Gmail & Windows Live
Web 1.0: HTML
Web2.0: XHTML & CSS
Web 1.0: Regards,
Web 2.0: regards
Web 1.0 - …
Web 2.0 - … beta
Web 1.0: VC
Web 2.0: MORE VC
Web 1.0: Yesterday
Web 2.0: Tomorrow
Web 1.0: any site
Web 2.0: ealier less, later any
Web 3.0: none, less, any
Web 1.0: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Web 2.0: Blindness
Web 1.0: sans-serif headlines
Web 2.0: giant Georgia headlines
Web 1.0: “Oolong the rabbit” head performance
Web 2.0: Cute Overload
Web 1.0: downloading Swedish rap from Kazaa
Web 2.0: watching Swedish rap videos on YouTube
Web 1.0: NetScape 4.x sucks
Web 2.0: IE sucks, what’s NetScape?
Web 1.0 : Buggy programs on computers and web servers
Web 2.0 : Buggy programs on computers, web servers and navigators
Web 1.0 : Web servers programmed in Perl
Web 2.0 : Web servers programmed in JavaScript soon ?
I am so late to this party. See the first comparison for the excuse.
Web 1.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it doesn’t exist
Web 2.0: You can’t use Bloglines because it crashes too much
Web 1.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution
Web 2.0: Good ideas typically require tons of bandwidth for their execution
Web 1.0: People ignore CSS
Web 2.0; People complain about CSS
Web 1.0: You need a sound card
Web 2.0: You need a wireless card
Web 1.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame interfaces
Web 2.0: Flash is often abused to publish lame videos
Web 1.0: Microsoft tries to assimilate the Internet
Web 2.0: Google tries to assimilate the Internet
Web 1.0: “Sex” is one of the more pupular keyword searches
Web 2.0: One of the more popular search services publishes a video in wich it is stated that “the Internet is for porn, porn, PORN!”
Web 1.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE
Web 2.0: The mass media companies wave their proverbial arms and carry on about how their online presence WILL be on the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE - only this time with CSS, XML, and video
Jeez, I could p-lay this game all day.
Web 1.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)
Web 2.0: Users submit comments and ratings (Amazon.com)
Web 1.0: Amazon.com patents one-click purchase
Web 2.0: O’Reilly copyrights “Web 2.0″
Web 1.0: Web 2.0
Web 2.0: Web 2.1
Web 1.0: Creation
Web 2.0: Evolution
Web 1.0: Guestbook
Web2.0: Comments
web 1.0 : haha lol omg
web 2.0 : ZOMG LIEK ROFL kekekeke !!11111 eins
web1.0: lobotomy
web2.0: lobotomy
Web 1.0: ascii
Web 2.0: utf-8
Web 1.0: VRML
Web 2.0: RIA
Web 1.0: discovering
Web 2.0: sifting through
Web 1.0: Mahir
Web 2.0: Borat
Web 1.0: “I like this file - I’ll download it.”
Web 2.0: “I like this file - I’ll upload it.”
web1.0: Companies control the message, don’t really listen effectively.
web2.0: Most companies control the message, a few have learned to tap users for content, and even fewer have learned to listen.
Web 1.0: Usenet flames
Web 2.0: Blog rants
web 1.0: aaargh my eyes, so much great content what a whack design
web 2.0: aaargh my eyes, i cant find good content, havent i seen that design before?
web 3.0: Spiderman, Spiderman, Does whatever a spider can, Spins a web, any size, Catches thieves just like flies, Look Out! Here comes the Spiderman.
This a terrible explanation of web 2.0
Here is what my company has defined as web 2.0:
1: User Generated Content
2: User control over presentation of content
3: Pervasive feedback (comment/rating) of content
Web 1.0: E-mail newsletter.
Web 2.0: RSS feed.
Web 1.0: $sql = “SELECT * FROM tbl_bookings”;
Web 2.0: $this->set(’bookings’, $this->Booking->findAll());
Web 1.0: Groupware
Web 2.0: Semantic Web
Web 1.0: folders
Web 2.0: tags
Web 1.0: Tons of annoying animated .gifs.
Web 2.0: Just the one (spinner.gif).
I was browsing bookmarks on del.icio.us and found an interesting link to a blog article calledWeb 2.0 Thinking Game. This article compares web 1.0 and web 2.0 with examples. I thought it would be neat to compare web 1.0 and web 2.0 in nonprofit technology. Here is what I have come up with: Web 1.0: Nonprofits post links to articles and press releases on their
Web 1.0: Tim Berners-Lee’s gift to the world.
Web 2.0: © O’Reilly.
Web 1.0: CGI
Web2.0: RoR
Zeldman has agreat poston what Web 2.0 means to different journalists and the wider interwebosphere™. He’s created a great Web 2.0 thinking game to illustrate Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0; here are a few examples: Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner.
Web 1.0 Evil Empire: Microsoft
Web 2.0 Evil Empire: Google
Web 1.0: Hype about a “new” medium which business people and investors didn’t have a clue about, bought into anyway and then killed.
Web 2.0: Hype about the same medium which marketers and brands don’t have a clue about, bought into anyway by spending more and more media dollars on, and will kill.
Web 3.0: The end of hype about the medium.
web 1.0 - Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by nothing.
web 2.0 - Lists of comments that are relevant to the post in question followed by 50 or so trackback comments from Digg etc to tell you just how popular other peoples comments were.
Web 1.0: Dunkin’ Donuts
Web 2.0: Starbucks
Web 1.0: NASDAQ
Web 2.0: DJIA
Web 1.0: Floppy disk
Web 2.0: Blu-Ray
Web 1.0: “spacer.gif”
Web 2.0: “spinner.gif”
Web 1.0 - My Site…
Web 2.0 - My Beta Site…
Web 1.0 - Times New Roman, Verdana, Arial…
Web 2.0 - Trebuchet MS, Georgia, Tahoma…
Web 1.0: The Industry Standard
Web 2.0: TechCrunch
Web 1.0: Skinny Britney Spears
Web 2.0: Fat Britney Spears
Web 1.0 - Boom (and bust)
Web 2.0 - Boom (and bust)
web 1.0: script applied to html
web 2.0: script applied to xml
web 1.0: adds
web 2.0: adwords
web 1.0: browser support issues
web 2.0: browser and feed aggregator support issues
Web 1.0: Outlook
Web 2.0: Google Calendar
Web 1.0: Blue Screen from Hell
Web 2.0: Kernal Panic
Web 1.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 2.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 3.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 4.0: Web Standards not fully supported
……………………………………………….
Web 5000.0: Web Standards not fully supported
Web 3.0: attention.xml et. al.
‘off with their heads!’
Web 1.0: desk calendar
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1.0: Excel
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1.0: newspaper
Web 2.0: Google
Web 1:0: e-Mail me
Web 2.0: Skype me
Web 1.0: junk-market
Web 2.0: eBay
Web 1.0: tables
Web 2.0: no tables
Web 1.0:
Web 2.0:
Web 1.0: my first homepage
Web 2.0: my first homepage 2.0 (beta)
Web 1.0: photo album
Web 2.0: flickr.com
Web 1.0: IE6
Web 2.0: IE6
Web 1.0: Encarta
Web 2.0: Wikipedia
I’m later to this party than everyone above me, and earlier than everyone below me. Go figure.
1.0: zefrank publishes videos of himself dancing on his website, gets famous after a mention in a magazine.
2.0: everyone publishes videos of themselves on YouTube, nobody gets famous
1.0: IRC
2.0: Trillian
1.0: Everyone copies Yahoo!
2.0: Everyone copies Google
1.0: Online publishing by handcoding articles in html pages, uploading, then updating all links
2.0: Blogging by clicking “Publish”
1.0: Subscription fees
2.0: Ad-supported
1.0: Popups and banners
2.0: Pop-in javascript windows, flash adverts that sit “under” the page, talking advertisements, “viral” ads, video ads, on and on…
1.0: Please visit my website :)
2.0: Please read my blog :)
Web 1.0:
RESPONSE.BUFFER=TRUE
dev: i do this way its ok right?
browser1: fine, fine… go ahead…
browser2: can u bla bla…
dev: who r u?
RESPONSE.FLUSH
Web 2.0:
DO WHILE (NOT DIE)
dev: i do this way its ok?
browser1: no, it must be bla..bla..
browser2: its ok, no problem
browser3: fine, but..
browser4: anything you do just fine
dev: ok i’ll think about it.
LOOP
Web 3.0:
DO WHILE (?)
Search in progress, please wait…
Search in progress, please wait…
LOOP?
crowd: wait a minute? how about Web 2.0?
Web 1.0: img tags
Web 2.0: Flickr tags
Web 1.0: streamed audio and webcams of PopMart Rotterdam
Web 2.0: phonecam video during a show; bootleg torrents 2 days after a show
Web 0.1: Zork
Web 2.0: Secondlife
Web 1.0 India and Pakistan, finally getting along, and what great tech.
Web 2.0 NK has a nuke, Japan’s tech starts looking awesome again.
Web 1.0: Get my presentation from our website
Web 2.0: Get my presentation from flickr/YouTube/Google Video
Web 1.0: AOL kills Usenet
Web 2.0: Google Groups kills Usenet
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game - Web 1.0 - Bubble, Web 2.0 - Denial of Bubble. [...]
Web 1.0: Trying to convince people to send emails
Web 2.0: Trying to convince people to stop sending so many emails
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game ★ [...]
[...] Fun! Great comments, too. Visit site [...]
[...] O autor do livro Desenvolvendo Sites Compatíveis, (citado aqui no blog), divulgou um divertido jogo no seu blog. A idéia é definir Web 1.0 e Web 2.0, como os exemplos abaixo, traduzidos do post do Zeldman e de alguns comentários: [...]
[...] Zeldman, author of the vastly popular Designing With Web Standards, offers an amusing comparison of Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0 trends here are my favorites: Web 1.0: Crap sites on Geocities. Web 2.0: Crap sites on MySpace. [...]
web 1.0: invalid overexpensive nonsense
web 2.0: valid overexpensive nonsense
[...] Dabar kaip žinote yra WEB 2.0 laikotarpis, kadaise buvo WEB 1.0 ir ateis kažkada WEB 3.0 laikotarpis. Kaip atskirti? Zeldman pasistengė apie tai pamastyti [...]
Web 1.0: Arial
Web 2.0: Lucida Grande
[...] Qua devono aver letto il tuo post. [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game - from Zeldman (on the money as per usual) [...]
[...] Design News Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] http://snippy.ceejbot.com/wiki/show/start/2006/10/17/001Jeffrey Zeldman invites you to contrast Web 1.0 with Web 2.0. Hee! [...]
[...] Jeffrey Zeldman on Web 1.0 vs Web 2.0 — It’s funny because it’s true. [...]
[...] New popular sites (Just new in last 24h). [...]
Web 1.0: Students plagerize information from random websites
Web 2.0: Students plagerize information from Wikipedia
Web 3.0: Students plagerize information from teacher approved source
[...] Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. [...]
[...] Zeldman 2.0 Thinking Game http://www.zeldman.com/2006/10/17/web-20-thinking-game/ My some of my favs Quote: [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game | Previews by Thumbshots.com | Add to del.icio.us | Digg it! [...]
[...] read more | digg story [...]
[...] Web 1.0: Tags. Web 2.0: “Tags.”read more | digg story [...]
Web 1.0: XML for describing everything
Web 2.0: Microformats for describing small parts of everything
[...] = Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
Web 1.0: “Version”
Web 2.0: “Service Release”
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Clearly “Web 2.0″ means different things to different journalists on different days. Mostly it means nothing—except a bigger paycheck. But let’s simplify what The Economist is saying: [...]
[...] alickop[Tags|humor, link, webdev]Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. linkpost comment [...]
[...] web Un billet de Jeffrey Zeldman qui résume parfaitement ma perception du web 2.0. [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game [...]
[...] Dat er al eindeloos veel artikels geschreven zijn om te lachen of wenen met de Web 2.0 hype/revive/internetzeepbel 2.0 weet ik. Toch wou ik jullie deze Web 2.0 Thinking Game niet onthouden. [...]
[...] Sur le même ton de Web 1.0 versus Web 2.0, je me demande ce que cela donnerait les élections présidentielles: 2002 versus 2007. [...]
[...] Liz (grrliz) wrote,@ 2006-10-18 04:16:00 Zeldman’s got the Web 2.0 thinking game, it’s pretty amusing.(Post a new comment) … [...]
Web 1.0 Trying to code simple and minimalistic homepages on Geocities
Web 2.0 Realising that Wordpress had already done that and done it better
[...] Sa suite bureautique, son effet web 2.0 et toute sa clique… Google comme on en a jamais autant parlé…Un bon article (en anglais) sur le blog de ZeldmanLa suite bureautique en question, bien chachée sur les pages Google [...]
[...] 21 Окт, 2006 at 3:35 AM alickopАвтор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут. Tags: [...]
[...] Nå, nu har Jeffrey Zeldman tagit upp skillnaderna mellan Web 1.0 och Web 2.0 i en bloggpost där han ber sina läsare kommentera och redogöra för sin syn på skillnaderna mellan 1.0 och 2.0.Intressant. Min kommentar såg ut så här: [...]
[...] Voici un petit jeu de comparaison initié par Zeldman dans son dernier billet et suivi par de bon commentaires aussi, c’est par ici. [...]
[...] Зельдман о Web 2.0 Автор, конечно, молодец, но и комменты жгут.Tags: humor, link, webdev [...]
[...] Web 2.0 Thinking Game Come and play. It’s fun! [...]
[...] Mittwoch, 18. Oktober 2006 Jeffrey Zeldman macht den Anfang eines Gedankenspiels, was jeder fortführen kann.Web 1.0: AOL buys Time Warner. Web 2.0: Google buys YouTube. [...]
[...] Read it here: Web 2.0 Thinking Game. Check out also Create your own Web 2.0 Company. Web 1.0: Writing. Web 2.0: Rating. [...]
[...] Забавная игра в к