Stalin decided what was good science. Millions starved.

What happens when leaders choose political expediency over science?

Russian pseudoscientist Trofim Lysenko, whose belief in Lamarckian inheritance Stalin embraced for political expediency. Millions of Russians died as a result.

[Soviet pseudoscientist Trofim Denisovich] Lysenko’s supposed innovation … was based on a disproven idea in evolutionary biology called Lamarckian inheritance. French biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and his followers thought that things an organism experiences in its lifetime can be handed down to the next generation. The classic example is a giraffe that has to stretch to reach leaves producing offspring with long necks.

This idea ran counter to Mendelian genetics, which holds that genes — not environmental influences — control traits and are passed to offspring. Mendelian geneticists thought it would take five years to breed more cold-tolerant crops. Lysenko said he could do it in two to three years.…

Lysenko was put in charge of a prestigious genetics institute and forced his scientifically unsound farming practices on the collective farms. His methods were disastrous.

Soaking seeds in freezing water hampered germination, leading to crop losses. Millions starved. Meanwhile, Mendelian genetics was branded a “whore of capitalism,” and geneticists were forced to renounce their views or lose their jobs. Many were jailed, and almost a dozen were executed or died in prison. — Tina Hesman Saey, Here’s what happens when you put politicians in charge of science

See also:

Trump administration proposal would all but end scientific merit in grant funding, critics sayLos Angeles Times, 10 July 2026

Researchers say this new Trump rule could destroy American science as we know it. They’re fighting back, CNN, 4 June 2026

What does Trump’s call for ‘gold standard science’ really mean?Science, 27 May 2025

One response to “Stalin decided what was good science. Millions starved.”

  1. L. Jeffrey Zeldman Avatar

    My Freshman Genetics professor at Indiana University explained it this way: In his youth, he had lost two toes to a lawn-mowing accident. If Lamarck was right, the professor’s children would inherit “missing toes” as a genetic trait. Of course that did not happen, because Lamarck was wrong. Anyway, the fascists in charge of the U.S. government are now using radical, right-wing ideological purity tests to choose which science projects to fund, and which to cancel. And the great brain drain continues.

Got something to say?

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)

Discover more from Jeffrey Zeldman Presents

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading